Going wide

photo of grass field
Photo by Alex P on Pexels.com

Last time I wrote about publishing my back catalog on Kobo and making all my older books nonexclusive to Amazon. This is called “going wide” in independent publishing circles. I mentioned I had been meaning to do this for some time, but kept putting it off. If you’re wondering why, it involves a ten-year backstory about my rocky relationship with non-Amazon distributors.

My first push toward independent publishing came from attending the 2014 AWP Conference & Bookfair in Seattle. Amazon was all over the conference, hosting multiple round table talks on Kindle publishing, seminars on how to publish on their platform, and handing out free CreateSpace print-on-demand samples. Although mildly skeptical, I returned home convinced it was worth an experiment or two.

The first book I published on Amazon’s Kindle Direct Publishing was A Concordance of One’s Life. It’s a short story collection—essentially my MFA thesis put into book form. I had zero expectations of big sales or shooting up the bestseller list. If things went pear-shaped, I lost little.

The process was amazingly smooth. I slapped together a passable cover using photos from my phone. I published it on Amazon with ease, and lo, my first book was available. Sales were in the single digits. That’s fine, it was a start. My San Francisco novella Everywhere Man soon followed.

In 2014, it seemed natural that I should publish my books everywhere I could, and I began researching other options. Smashwords was my first stop.

Smashwords is an old-timer in the e-publishing sector, predating even Amazon (I believe). Its founder is an e-publishing evangelist who even e-published his own book to spread the good word. Unlike Amazon, which has quality standards they expect authors to follow, Smashwords accepts anything: Word documents, crappy PDFs, even plain text files. If it could be read, Smashwords wanted to host it.

This meant, of course, that my books were side-by-side with some truly awful options, both in terms of writing quality and reading comfort. The site’s layout was archaic, and had few options for book discovery.

What’s more, Smashwords offered no easy way to read the books or documents you downloaded. Amazon had free Kindle Reader apps and a Kindle standalone handheld device. Both automated buying, downloading, and reading books. With Smashwords, the reader was on their own.

Sales on Smashwords were nearly zero. The only way I was going to get people to find my books there was to spread links to Smashwords myself. If I was going to do that, I would rather send them to Amazon, which made it far easier to load my ebooks on a Kindle reader. For years I offered my first two ebooks for free on Smashwords. It made no difference in downloads.

I also tried Barnes & Noble. Unlike Amazon and Smashwords, B&N was immensely unfriendly in 2014 and reluctant to deal with an independent writer. They went so far as requiring me to file for a B&N vendor ID, which was the same ID used for selling goods in their physical stores, from books to candy to stuffed animals. I managed to get my first two ebooks up on their web site, but like Smashwords, they offered no way to make my books known to their browsing customers. What’s more, their Kindle-like handheld reader (“Nook”) was overly expensive, underpowered, and did not sell well.

Next came Apple Books. Like B&N, they were also reluctant to deal with independent writers. They made establishing a publisher account feel like I was dealing with a bureaucrat who could not stop rolling his eyes as I filled out the form. Worse, they don’t support buying a book on the Web—you had to launch their Books iPhone or iPod app to search the Apple Store. And, like the others, there was almost no way to get my books in front of people who might be searching for a title like my own.

That’s when I got to Kobo’s Writing Life, which is Kobo’s e-publishing system. Kobo was far more welcoming than Apple and B&N. Publishing books was almost easier than Amazon’s KDP. They offered resources for writing and editing their books, and links to print-on-demand publishers if I wanted to offer a paperback on their site.

Like the other non-Amazon platforms, though, discovery was again a problem. Once more, it was upon me to spread links to my Kobo pages far & wide so readers could find my books. And, I don’t believe Kobo at that time offered an ebook reader of their own, leaving readers on their own to load their purchased selections on a reader. (I might be mistaken about this last point, however.)

Ten years on

Reviewing these options over ten years later, it’s remarkable how little has changed.

Kobo remains the best of the non-Amazon bunch. Their publishing system is similar to the 2014 experience, but it was always easy to use and navigate, so I’m fine with that. It still has its publishing resources list, and its book details pages (where a reader can examine the book before buying) look about the same as before.

B&N learned their lesson the hard way and made publishing books on their web site much, much friendlier. Their publishing portal operates much like Kobo’s now, and it appears it’s easier for a new writer to sign up. Smashwords was sold to Draft2Digital, but the web site stands more or less as it was when I first logged in. Apple remains a cold and unfriendly business partner.

The biggest remaining problem with these platforms? Discovery. I’ve used the word a few times already. Let me explain what it means in this context.

If you go to the home page for any of these booksellers, you are presented with bestsellers and new books and old standbys from the Big Four publishers—Penguin Random House, Macmillan, Hachette Book Group, and HarperCollins, and their numerous imprints. While Amazon also gives these big-name (and high-paying) publishers lots of screen real estate, you will also find titles from independent authors mixed in, especially on their Top 100 lists for the various genres: Westerns, science-fiction, biography, and so forth. Not so with the other platforms.

Amazon also offers independent authors the ability to advertise their books. Advertising can be set up a few different ways, but it’s usually a per-click price auction. The author gets to decide what search terms or what kind of content the ad should be placed near. This is an amazing way to let readers know of your work.

Per-click advertising is unavailable on the other platforms. Kobo toyed with the idea, but never followed through.

Likewise, Amazon will advertise your book—for free—through “Others bought these similar books” and “Suggested titles” lists it shows on book detail pages. This is another great way for readers to discover new books—if someone enjoys cyberpunk, it’s likely they’ll at least want to know about my take on the genre.

The other platforms only offer a “More titles by this author” on a book page. That’s it. Worse, this feature is broken, and has been broken for over ten years. Here’s why.

Amazon has a concept of author pages, where a writer can group their titles under their name and biographical blurb. It’s sort of like a bookshelf of all the author’s works. That’s why you can click the link to my name on any of my book pages and go right to my Amazon author page.

None of the above platforms—including Kobo—have such a concept. Their “More titles by this author” lists are nothing more than a lazy search of all books on their site with the same author name. When you have a name as common as “Jim Nelson,” that means books by complete strangers are presented as mine.

This was annoying, but forgivable, in 2014. It’s maddening in 2025.

I wrote Kobo support about this in 2021. As with per-click advertising, they said author pages were something “we are looking into the possibility for the future.” They’ve yet to follow through. Remember, their systems know which books are mine—I uploaded them to their servers through a single account! Yes, things get more complicated when a single author has multiple publishers, but that doesn’t excuse using a simple keyword search to locate an author’s books.

Year after year, Amazon has listened to independent authors and improved their publishing system to accommodate our needs. Is it perfect? Not in the least. But I do see a continuous process of refinement unseen on the other platforms. That demonstrates to me a level of commitment the others are not making.

I’m not here to tell you that Amazon is a wonderful company. You may have real issues with their size, their sales model, their profits, their international scope, their practices, or their founder’s politics. I won’t argue with any of that.

But for ten years now, Amazon has treated me more like a business partner than any other publishing platform out there. Not a peer, perhaps, but at least a partner of sorts.

That’s an awful lot of grumbling on my part. Why move my books to Kobo now?

My Kindle Unlimited page reads have dropped considerably in the past two years. Sales have dropped too. I don’t write the kind of books that move big numbers of copies. That throne is currently held by romance, fantasy, and hard science-fiction multi-volume series, with lots of battles and excitement, and plenty of sex and plunder. I prefer standalone novels centered around one or two characters, and stories with a solid beginning, middle, and end.

On the advertising front, the booming Kindle publishing market has brought with it inflated per-click prices. I’m seeing $2+ per-click(!) auction prices for certain high-value, high-margin book categories, a price I’m unwilling to pay, since a click is no guarantee of a sale.

With my back catalog having a harder time finding an audience, it’s time to expand their availability, especially since I’ve learned that folks in Commonwealth nations seem to prefer Kobo.

I’m happy to oblige.

Kobo & me

Edward Teller Dreams of Barbecuing People by Jim Nelson

For some time now, I’ve been planning to make my older books available on ebook platforms not named after South American rainforests. After a couple of years of putting it off—I’m a notorious procrastinator—a friend and professional acquaintance in New Zealand asked why he couldn’t get my books from Kobo, his preferred platform. That set me in motion.

(It was not my first time hearing this suggestion. A reader from Canada asked me the same question a few years back.)

Previously, the only books of mine available on Kobo were my short story collection A Concordance of One’s Life, my San Francisco novella Everywhere Man, and my COVID-19 novel Man in the Middle. A few days ago I added my teenage growing-of-age debut Edward Teller Dreams of Barbecuing People to that list. You can expect the list to grow over the next couple of months, as I begin posting books from the Bridge Daughter series and In My Memory Locked.

What’s the hold up? Why not post all of them now?

The remaining novels are enrolled in an Amazon program called Kindle Select, which offers writers a number of nice features. For me, the most desirable benefit is that it places my books into Kindle Unlimited, which is a kind of Netflix-style book buffet, where subscribers can read as many books as they want for a monthly fee. KU was a great way for readers to be introduced to my work, and for awhile there I saw a lot of my books being read through that program.

Unfortunately, Kindle Unlimited readers have dwindled off for my back catalog (it tends to favor newer releases). So, as my older books fall out of Kindle Select, I’ll add them to Kobo. I’ll start moving my back catalog to Barnes & Noble and Apple Books as well. (This is called “going wide” in independent publishing circles.)

Aside from Kindle Unlimited, why did I wait so long to go wide? I’ll answer that question next time.

Status

IN MY MEMORY LOCKED selected for the SPSFC

In My Memory Locked by Jim Nelson

This morning I received an email informing me In My Memory Locked was accepted for the Self-Published Science Fiction Competition (SPSFC).

This is the contest organized by Hugh Howey (WOOL) and Duncan Swan (Monstre), well-known authors in the independent publishing arena. They’ve organized ten teams of 59 judges (authors, readers, and podcasters) to narrow the field to a final winner.

Three hundred books were selected for the running, so there’s plenty of competition. The SPSFC generated a ton of buzz via word-of-mouth in the self-publishing community. The number of entrants blew past the 300 mark within hours of accepting applications. I’m plenty proud to have made the first cut.

The first round group my entry is a part of will be judged by File 770.

If you’re curious what the hub-bub is over, check out In My Memory Locked, available now in Kindle and paperback.

Semi-finalists will be announced January of next year. Finalists and winner are announced in June. Fingers crossed!

Kindle Vella at Always Be Publishing

Kindle Vella sample title page

Over at my Substack newsletter, I’ve posted a broad summary of what we know about Amazon’s newest publishing platform, Kindle Vella. A quick summary:

Kindle Vella is a new pay-as-you-go platform for serialized fiction. …

Vella is structured for publishing stories one “episode” at a time. Amazon doesn’t use the word “chapter”—I’ll discuss this below—but, for now, that’s a handy way to think of Vella’s episodes.

Each episode is 600 to 5,000 words. (Amazon’s numbers are so specific, I assume this range is enforced by their software.) Readers can read the first three episodes of a story for free.

If they want to continue reading, readers purchase Vella tokens to unlock additional episodes.

Will I be writing for Kindle Vella? I’m not certain yet. Serialized fiction is more than releasing a new chapter every week. Writers like Dickens and Armistead Maupin succeeded with serializations because they understood how to feed readers details a drop or two at a time, and keep them wanting for more. It’s an art that seemed lost until recently, when episodic fiction began to make a comeback online.

I’ve written before that I see self-publishing as an experiment, and so this is one more experiment I’m considering. We’ll see.

Read more about what Kindle Vella is and is not over at Always Be Publishing.

The latest at Always Be Publishing

If you’re a writer and not checked out my Substack newsletter, Always Be Publishing, you might give it a go. Since I last wrote about it here, I’ve released a few more posts on writing and publishing in the digital age.

Recent topics include

You can find a list of the posts I’ve made so far at the archive. If you’re interested in a free subscription to receive new posts straight to your inbox, here’s where you can start.

“Always Be Publishing” at Substack

I recently started a new site at Substack, a blog platform with email subscription service. I call it Always Be Publishing.

What’s it about? Why did I start another blog? Some answers are in my introductory post:

Always Be Publishing is about the business and practical side of being a self-publishing writer.

Six years ago, I wouldn’t have dreamed about offering advice to anyone about self-publishing, other than “You might look into it.” Today, I feel more confident about what I know and what I don’t know. I’ve also learned from the various mistakes I’ve made.

That’s why I started Always Be Publishing. It’s for people interested in the independent publishing revolution, but don’t know where to start, writers already self-publishing and seeking perspectives on how to grow their readership, and people who are looking for encouragement to keep writing and not give up…

You can find a list of the posts I’ve made so far at the archive. If you’re interested in subscribing, here’s where you can start.

Kindle Scout in Memoriam

Originally published at Hidden Gems Books.

At the end of May Amazon’s e-publishing venture Kindle Scout was put to rest after a run of three-plus years. Amazon announced the winding down in an email sent to all of the program’s registered users (“Scouts” in Amazon’s parlance) on April 2. The email was cool and understated considering the subject matter: “[W]e wanted to let you know of some upcoming changes being made to the Kindle Scout program” followed by businesslike details of the program’s orderly shutdown. Amazon’s Kindle Scout was an innovative approach to publishing never before tried, yet it died with neither a bang nor a whimper, but with the clearing of a throat.

Reader-powered publishing

Let’s rewind and look at what made Kindle Scout so different in the publishing world. Rather than the traditional process of publishing—unknown authors cold-submitting into a mountainous slush-pile while well-known authors are courted by editors—Kindle Scout tacked a direction both democratic and meritocratic in nature, a process it dubbed “reader-powered publishing.”

It worked like this: Writers submitted their novels to Kindle Scout for consideration. Kindle Scout posted the first three chapters on their Amazon.com web site along with the book’s cover, author’s bio, and so forth. Readers perused these novels much like bookstore patrons sample paperbacks from a rotating wire rack. Readers—”Scouts”—could then vote on which novels they wanted to see published. (Scouts were rewarded for participating by receiving free ebooks of accepted work, which in turn drove reviews and ratings on Amazon.) Each books’ nomination campaign lasted thirty days, giving authors ample motivation to promote their work via the social networks, word-of-mouth, message boards—some even purchased online click-through advertising for their campaigns.

If an author earned enough attention from Scouts (and the approval of the Amazon editors) they could secure a contract with Kindle Press, the e-publishing arm of Amazon that administered Kindle Scout. The contract included publication in Kindle format (sorry, no paperback), a $1,500 advance, fifty-fifty ebook royalties, and marketing backed by Amazon’s muscle power. Not shabby for any struggling writer attempting to break into the publishing world.

Kindle Scout’s first round of winners were announced on November 27, 2014. Over the next three and half years, Kindle Scout would select for publication nearly 300 titles of all genres and styles. Books ranged from the straightforward to the bizarre, from romance to science-fiction to historical dramas to novels of literary intent. Kindle Press was not a publisher of genre fiction—it published everything.

Royal Date by Sariah Wison is one of Kindle Scout’s biggest success stories.

Kindle Scout’s semi-open approach to publication was bolder than it sounds. An unspoken belief in the traditional publishing world is that book editors have reached their position because they’re fit to judge a novel on its artistic merits and profit possibilities—editors are the professionals, the gatekeepers, the tastemakers, the adults in the room. Granting Scouts that responsibility and power sounds absurd on the face of it. After all, anyone with an Amazon account could sign-up and start voting—who do you know without an Amazon account? And yet—it worked.

In addition to the manuscript itself, Kindle Scout expected writers to provide a submission package: a 45-character tag line (harder than it sounds!), a book description, a thank-you note for Scouts, and even the book’s cover. Off-loading these tasks on the author meant the writer was wearing shoes normally reserved for book agents and front-line editors. Kindle Press sometimes released the author’s submission package as-is with no editorial or artistic revisions. (Unfortunately, this led to an early reputation of publishing “trash” novels fostered in part by a snarky write-up in Slate magazine.) Later on, editorial services were offered to accepted writers. Some books received new covers after publication gratis Kindle Press.

Kindle Scout was one-part bold experiment, one-part do-it-yourself publishing, and one-part partnering with Amazon’s marketing might. Another way to put it: Kindle Scout was turn-key independent publishing for the small-time author ready to step up their game.

My experience

When I submitted my novel Bridge Daughter to Kindle Scout, that’s pretty much how I viewed the program: An experiment in independent publishing with potential big returns. I’d shopped my book around to a handful of agents with the usual discouraging results and form-letter responses. Curious, I studied Kindle Scout’s FAQ and legal boilerplate and thought it was worth a go. If nothing else, I knew I’d kick myself later if I didn’t at least try.

My attraction to Kindle Scout was not merely its web-savvy nomination process. Kindle Scout’s winners list boasted publisher-friendly genres like romance and epic fantasy as well as quiet and quirky work. I found myself drawn to novels like Katie O’Rourke’s family drama Finding Charlie, Erik Therme’s chilling Resthaven, and Bradley Wind’s wonderfully personal A Whole Lot.

With my novel prepped and submission package assembled, I filled in Kindle Scout’s online form, clicked a mouse button, and sent my book into the aether. Four days later, my book was on the Kindle Scout web site and accepting votes. If you’ve submitted work to agents or literary magazines and waited months for a response, four days probably sounds like sheer fantasy. It was another example of Kindle Scout ignoring accepted norms in the publishing world.

Plenty of people (including myself) pondered the skeleton key leading to publication. Was it page views of your book’s Scout page during the nomination period? The number of reader nominations? Kindle Scout’s secret sauce was its mysterious “Hot & Trending” badge which signified growing interest in your book. Speculation surrounding the algorithm was so rampant, disreputable “services” arose on the Internet purporting to guarantee thirty days of Hot & Trending for a modest nonrefundable fee.

It may sound naive, but I suspect Kindle Press editors tended to publish based on content and marketability—in other words, using criteria much like their traditional publishing counterparts. The number of nominations a book received was never revealed to a winner so far as I know. (There’s a reason Scouts “nominated” books rather than “voted” for them. It was not a purely democratic process.) It seems to me the coveted Hot & Trending badge kept authors busy promoting their book during the 30-day campaign, doing the legwork a tech-shrewd publicist would normally perform.

And perhaps that was the best reason for an independent author to try Kindle Scout: Promotion. Putting sample chapters of your latest book on amazon.com before tens of thousands of potential readers is a fine way to generate pre-release buzz. The Kindle Scout platform was custom-built to kick-start ebook sales.

Alas, the good times hit a road bump in the first quarter of 2017. A change in editorial staff was announced via private channels to Kindle Press authors. Although not obvious at first, as the months wore on the pace of accepted manuscripts slowed to a trickle. The diversity I’d so admired also narrowed. A Kindle Press editor admitted to me earlier this year they were seeking work for the “Kindle Reader:” accessible fiction for an adult readership. Nothing wrong with that, merely unfortunate that Kindle Press couldn’t keep the door open for writers striking out on a different trail.

What’s next?

With Kindle Scout’s funky little experiment shuttered for good, I find myself strangely nostalgic. There really was something exhilarating about joining the experiment and seeing where it would take me. It strikes me that Amazon charted a map showing a new way of doing business in the publishing world. Kindle Scout’s formula could be replicated by an ambitious and web-savvy small publisher, or even an established house’s imprint seeking to shake things up. Yes, the book closes on Kindle Scout with the clearing of a throat. Let’s see if there’s a sequel.